The immigration figures: Who are you calling immigrant?

Written by Brigitte Vasallo. Posted in Figures, Migration, Racism, Who are you calling immigrant?

It published the Report on Migration 2011 International Organization for Migration (IOM) and the same day released the data means: “The Spanish think that coexist with more immigrants than there are in reality“.

Great news: in Spain are believed to be a 21% immigrant population when in reality the figure is 14%. Where does the misperception? The IOM proposes a cause: there is no common understanding about the meaning of the word “Immigration”. And here, with a candor pasmante, clarifies: the respondents and grouped under the same term for migrant workers, refugees, asylum seekers and even students or tourists.

Let me point other cause: the idea of ​​Spanishness. When we say “be Spanish” imagine a white prototype is necessarily, probably Catholic and Castilian possibly. A Sanchez Gonzalez or any. Blond or blonde as much. An old Christian, was said before.

In this prototype is difficult to include the real Spain where they live and grow several generations of Spanish who are neither blancxs, ni ni católicxs if apellidan Martínez Soria. People have come and done from here or people born here. Not that they are Spanish and they do not really; Nor is that they are “mixture” the “mestizos”, as they are also called, much less to be so terrible that has been called “immigrant second, third or fourth generation”, as if the migration of the parents is inherited by sons and daughters.

The error is in the prototype: the Perez white Catholics are perhaps most, but they are not and never were the only way of being and belonging.

More:

Report on Migration 2011 IOM
PD: Looking for photo to accompany this post I Cross with the definition given in Wikipedia Concha Buika: “Concha Buika(No Palma de Mallorca; 1972)Afro-singer.”

This, clearly, deserve another post…

The immigration figures

Written by Brigitte Vasallo. Posted in Figures, Migration

el roto integracionIf I Said, lacks, because my motives are entirely unremarkable: a country without extranjerxs is untenable because living among peers is a pain. It's that easy. But I understand that this reason will convince the world. Therefore, leave here linkadas figures from a study of the La Caixa Foundation empirically demonstrating why a country (I write this from the, Without going any further) immigration is unsustainable without.

To whet your mouth, advance two arguments:

Youth and high rates of activity of the immigrants have been another factor contributing to raise the proportion of pensioners onin search of 2,5 percent, This has delayed in nearly five years the deficit expected entry into the Spanish pension system.

Even immigrants who are illegally staying in Spain contribute to the system to pay indirect taxes, stimulate consumption and perform tasks that allow indigenous women enter the labor market, the conclusions of the report.

More informationhttp://ethic.es/2011/07/inmigracion-y-xenofobia /