Never thought I would write this, but the truth is that I'm going to fucking taste Rajoy cuts. Especially when it affects the subject that fascinates me so much to me: immigration ® . Or in Spanish castizo, loud and clear as day and age: Blacks.

When the cuts affect blacks birth I laugh. I find it sexy that does not give medical assistance to a person in an irregular situation. In a black ilegal. For only missing! Does an illegal black listed something to deserve the public health? On. A definite no. An illegal black tomatoes purchase without VAT, sneaks into the subway and not pay taxes on the water you drink steals as the public sources, least in Badalona, where have been closed to kill thirst and finish before. An illegal black to the back part to enrich the landlords (How beautiful greenhouses!) or generate wealth and enjoy it deserves. (Y, remember: black is not working illegal to not pay your taxes. Is your employer, white, which are not paid for their work).

(The hippies of human rights will the outcry when they read this post, but I do not see that relationship may have human rights with illegal black. We're not talking about Barak Obama, Ladies and Gentlemen, so handsome and so well dressed. Here we are discussing real black).

I propose to Rajoy other measures may not have calculated. Have you thought how much it will cost to collect the bodies of all these illegal black, now no option to doctor, palmando possibly end up in the street? A bundle, clearly. On top of that come to die here, (mortal tourism, I think his name) that want to bury… And unlisted!

It is cheaper to let their bodies in the streets. And if they died from something contagious that nobody has come to identify early, for better. With 5 and a half million unemployed, nobody will deny that a small epidemic we would do well to improve a little our numbers at the end of quarter. Merkel would be happy. Total, 6 millions more or less…

More

Redinmigrante: The universal health care is a myth for many immigrants

Losing the North: The immigration figures

When last 14 December I read that the European Parliament voted against the extension of the agreement on fisheries between the European Union and Morocco sought directly from the great compliments Spanish racists on the subject. But, inexplicably, I have not found.

Throw in the thread:

EP says that the agreement leads to overexploitation, is illegal because it interferes with the Saharawi people's resources and is not profitable for the EU, you pay a very high rate to Morocco in exchange for very little fishing licenses (few, add, but that cause overexploitation).

By The Vanguard “requests the Commission to present as soon as a negotiating mandate for a future EU-Morocco fisheries agreement “that is sustainable economic, ecologically and socially. It also asks that the future pact Brussels fits the actual fishing opportunities from scientific studies and consultation with the fishermen. MEPs demanded that the agreement contributes to the development of fisheries in . On respect for the resources of the Western Sahara, resolution, agreed by popular, Socialists and Liberals, calls for respect “international law and the benefits of local population”.

The report of the IOM makes it clear: the only effective formula for returning migrants to their places of origin is to improve living conditions there. White and bottled, to speak.

“(…) Poland's example highlights the effects of the economic performance of a country of origin on return decisions of migrants. From 2008 was an increase in the number of Polish migrants returning, which probably reflects the fact that Poland is the only EU member that has not fallen into recession and continued economic growth”.

Thanks to a future more equitable fishing, therefore, the Mohamed ® Duran i Lleida or Cleries Councillor will return home is not great?

In the case of Morocco, however, There are still a final hurdle. Fisheries agreements (or any other) negotiated with a corrupt regime (muuuyyy corrupt).

And this is where problems come. The corrupt regime lease its territorial waters as if they were personal assets, oblivious to the needs of people. That's good for the “incorruptible” Europe as we are allowed to fish at our ease. However, the people, ruined, migrate to survive. And to get to Europe become the subject of electoral campaigning and political concerns of those same populists who signed fishing agreements with corrupt regimes unjust. We come to steal the work and identity… and we believe what we voted for them to continue signing agreements and filling the same, at the same time, hate our political discourse.

More: 

IOM: Report 2011 Migration

Public: LMEPs to cancel the fishing agreement with Rabat by Sahara

ABC: Moroccan 20F movement hits the streets

I Idan Toledano amigo, hodgepodge that knows a lot of racism and, sent me this amazing video where some Mexican children, located in front of a white doll and a black, respond to questions such “What is good and what is bad?”.

(Click on the image to see video)

The comments received by the video on Youtube are diverse: there are those who doubt the worth of the study and there are those who accuse fathers and mothers of racist. You do not have the children come from families especially racist: messages are everywhere. From the cribs, since we are at Christmas, those children who present Jesus (Palestinian Jews) Beckham fairer, to Beyoncé clarified various shades in ads for L'Oreal. No doubt: ser blancx mola, is nicer, most prestigious… Kinder.

I leave, as an example, the report (disgusting) published a few weeks ago the magazine Hello on a Colombian matrons very proud of having known and having the city behind (they have) and the two colonial statues that are to be persons of flesh and blood. Here you have a photo. Breathe deep.

More: 

Twitter: @ RacismoenMexico
Facebook: www.facebook.com / norazas